TL;DR
Get wellness gear delivered free — and shop member deals
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Access to Prime Big Deal Days deals on October 6–7
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
In a Tiny Buddha essay, Ayurvedic medical student Joey Dua describes how burning eyes during long study sessions prompted him to pause and notice how narrowly he was directing his attention. He says brief breaks and looking into the distance helped him feel more aware, while acknowledging that the practices he tried are not established therapies.
Ayurvedic medical student Joey Dua says recurring eye burning during long study sessions led him to reconsider how he used his attention, in a personal essay published by Tiny Buddha. He describes studying on screens for 12 or 13 hours a day, then trying brief pauses and distance gazing; his account is personal, and he does not present those practices as proven treatments.
Dua writes that his eyes began burning at about 9 p.m. during his second year of Ayurvedic medical school, as exams approached. Lecture slides, reference books and practice questions were all on screens, and he says he spent 12 or 13 hours a day reading them. Although he was studying Shalakya Tantra, an Ayurvedic discipline concerning the eyes and head, he says he continued to rub his eyes and return to his work.
One winter evening, a power flicker interrupted his study. When the light returned, he briefly had difficulty focusing on the far wall; his vision sharpened again within seconds. Dua says the episode was not medically dramatic, but it made him realize he had not recently looked at the view beyond his desk. He connects the narrow focus of his studies with skimming messages, eating without much attention and scrolling while his mother spoke on the phone.
He then tried practices described by his professors: cupping warmed hands over closed eyes, looking toward a distant view, splashing his eyes with cool water and closing them fully during the day. Dua says these pauses helped him notice tension and shallow breathing. He also explicitly cautions that he cannot say the practices are proven therapies, adding that some have received little study.
Screen Study and Everyday Attention
Dua’s essay offers a first-person account of how sustained close screen work felt to one student, and how discomfort became a cue to stop. Its central observation is that long hours of concentrated work can coexist with reduced awareness of surroundings and conversations. That is the writer’s interpretation of his own experience; the essay does not establish that screen use caused broader attention changes or that his routines would have the same effects for others.
The account may resonate with readers who spend long stretches on devices, but its practical takeaway is modest: Dua says he now pauses when his eyes burn, closes them briefly or looks out at a tree. The report does not offer clinical findings, measure changes in attention or claim that these steps treat an eye condition.
A Student’s Screen-Heavy Study Routine
Dua describes studying material about eye health while relying heavily on a laptop and phone for exam preparation. He recalls having learned Ayurvedic descriptions of factors said to aggravate the eyes, including close focus, limited rest, dryness and staying up late. The essay presents this as part of his medical-school education and personal reflection; it does not independently verify those traditional claims as medical evidence.
The essay also identifies Dua as a BAMS student and says he runs Darakhtveda, an Indian Ayurvedic brand whose first product is I-Care Eye Drops. That connection is relevant context for readers assessing the author’s perspective. The account does not provide clinical trial results or evidence about the product, and the essay’s reflections on his own routines should not be read as product testing.
“I was not paying attention. I was narrowing it.”
— Joey Dua, in his Tiny Buddha essay
What the Essay Cannot Establish
The essay does not report an eye examination, diagnosis or clinical assessment of Dua’s burning eyes or brief focusing difficulty. It also gives no measured outcomes showing whether his breaks changed his vision, eye discomfort or attention over time. The author says the practices he tried are not proven therapies and that some have limited study; their effectiveness remains unclear from this account.
The source does not specify when the essay was published. It also does not provide further detail on research into the practices, or evidence about the eye-drop product associated with Dua’s business.
Dua’s Ongoing Study Routine
Dua says he remains a student and continues to use screens, but now responds to eye burning by pausing, closing his eyes or going to the window. He describes the change as a continuing personal habit rather than a cure. The essay names no formal follow-up study, medical evaluation or planned next milestone, so any broader conclusions about the practices will require evidence beyond this account.
Key Questions
What happened to Joey Dua’s eyes?
Dua says his eyes began burning around 9 p.m. during a period when he studied on screens for 12 or 13 hours a day. He also recounts a brief episode of difficulty focusing on a far wall after a power flicker; he says his vision sharpened again within seconds.
What practices did Dua try?
He describes warming and cupping his hands over closed eyes, looking toward distant rooftops, splashing his eyes with cool water and closing his eyes fully during the day.
Does the essay show these practices treat eye strain?
No. Dua describes his own experience and says he cannot call the practices proven therapies. The essay does not present clinical evidence or measured treatment outcomes.
What does Dua say he changed?
He says he no longer pushes through eye burning in the same way. He pauses, closes his eyes or looks out at a nearby tree, and treats the discomfort as a prompt to notice where his attention has been.
Source: rss
Cold & flu season Picks
humidifiers
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
